Decision Support · Side-by-side
Compare pricing, strengths, and use cases so it is easier to pick the right fit.
Change tools
For most everyday users, ArcLab wins on affordability and simplicity, especially if you need to quickly turn existing documents into mobile-friendly training. Continu is the stronger choice if you need a full-featured LMS with dedicated support and integrations like Slack, but its hidden pricing makes it risky for small budgets. The single biggest difference: ArcLab is a freemium tool for quick content conversion, while Continu is a premium platform for comprehensive training management.
ArcLab
Continu
Scores at a glance
Choose ArcLab if
Choose Continu if
Key differences
Facts side by side
| ArcLab | Continu | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | ||
| Mobile app | ||
| API access |
Common questions
Yes. ArcLab's free tier and low per-learner cost make it affordable for solos, while Continu's hidden pricing and enterprise focus are overkill and likely too expensive.
You can access Continu through a mobile web browser, but there is no dedicated mobile app. It's usable but not as smooth as a native app.
ArcLab. You upload a PowerPoint or PDF and it converts it into a lesson in minutes. Continu requires more setup and learning its advanced features.
No. ArcLab has no integrations with Slack, Teams, or other tools. Continu does integrate with both.
Continu is stronger because it offers certifications and personalized learning paths. ArcLab provides compliance records but not formal certificates.
ArcLab wins for quick, affordable training from existing files; Continu wins for full-featured enterprise training with integrations.
If you want to get started today without spending a dime, pick ArcLab—upload your old slides and you're done. If you have a team, a budget, and need training to live inside Slack or Teams, Continu is worth the sales call. For most everyday users, ArcLab is the simpler, cheaper choice.