Decision Support · Side-by-side

AudioShake vs Fadr. Side by side.

Compare pricing, strengths, and use cases so it is easier to pick the right fit.

Browse alternatives Browse workflows

Change tools

Comparison Ready

AudioShake

Fadr

Best overall

For everyday users who want to remix songs, extract vocals, or master tracks on a budget, Fadr is the clear winner: it's affordable, works in a browser, and delivers great results in minutes. AudioShake is a professional-grade tool for studios and labels that need pristine audio fidelity and advanced features like lyric alignment, but its pay-per-track pricing and lack of a mobile app make it overkill for most regular people. The single biggest difference is price and accessibility: Fadr costs $10/month and works anywhere, while AudioShake requires contacting sales and is built for high-volume commercial use.

AudioShake

Contact Sales #2975 of 3,826 Web

Fadr

$10/mo or $100/yr #1061 of 3,826 Web

Scores at a glance

AudioShakeFadrPractical Versatility

Onboarding Ease

Ecosystem Fit

Market Value

Choose AudioShake if

You're a music producer or sound engineer who needs studio-grade stem separation for commercial releases
You work with Dolby Atmos or spatial audio and need precise multitrack preparation
You need word-level lyric timestamps for karaoke, subtitles, or sync licensing
You're a label or post-production house processing hundreds of tracks per month and can justify per-track costs

Choose Fadr if

You record customer interviews or podcasts weekly and want to isolate voices from background noise
You're a bedroom producer or DJ who wants to quickly remix songs and extract MIDI chords
You want to master your own music for social media or streaming without learning complex software
You're a teacher or student who needs to separate instruments from songs for ear training or analysis

Key differences

Fadr costs $10/month with a free tier; AudioShake requires contacting sales and charges per track
Fadr works in any browser on any device; AudioShake has no mobile app and needs a computer
AudioShake offers lyric alignment and high-res WAV up to 96kHz; Fadr caps at standard WAV quality on paid plans
Fadr is designed for quick, intuitive remixing; AudioShake is built for professional post-production workflows
AudioShake has an enterprise-grade API for large-scale integration; Fadr focuses on individual creators
Fadr's onboarding takes minutes with no technical steps; AudioShake requires API key setup and technical know-how

Facts side by side

	AudioShake	Fadr
Free plan
Mobile app
API access

AudioShake: strengths & weaknesses

Top-notch audio quality for professional stems and mastering
Includes lyric-to-audio alignment and MIDI conversion, rare in one tool
Handles high-resolution WAV files up to 96kHz/24-bit
Supports immersive audio prep for Dolby Atmos workflows
No mobile app — you need a computer and a stable internet connection
Pay-per-track pricing can get expensive fast if you're experimenting
Setup requires API keys and technical steps, not beginner-friendly
No free tier to test before committing

Fadr: strengths & weaknesses

Best-in-class vocal isolation for a web tool — clean, fast, and easy
Intuitive remix room lets you adjust stems like a DJ without any software
Very fast cloud processing — upload a song and get stems in under a minute
Affordable $10/month or $100/year, with a free tier to try it out
MIDI extraction can be messy on complex chords or polyphonic instruments
Free tier only lets you download lower-quality MP3s, not WAVs
Mastering profiles are preset-based, not as customizable as dedicated mastering tools
No offline mode — you must be online to use it

Common questions

Is AudioShake better than Fadr for separating vocals from a song?

For most people, no — Fadr's vocal isolation is best-in-class for a web tool and much easier to use. AudioShake may edge ahead in fidelity for professional mastering, but you'll pay more and need technical setup.

Can I use Fadr on my phone?

Yes, Fadr works in any mobile browser — upload a file and get stems on your phone. AudioShake has no mobile app and requires a desktop browser with a stable connection.

Which tool is better for a beginner who wants to remix songs?

Fadr is the clear choice: its remix room lets you adjust stems visually, and you don't need any software or technical skills. AudioShake is overkill for beginners.

Does AudioShake offer a free trial?

AudioShake does not have a free tier — you must contact sales and pay per track. Fadr offers a free tier with lower-quality MP3 downloads, so you can test it before paying.

Can I extract MIDI from a full song with these tools?

Both can extract MIDI, but Fadr's MIDI extraction can be messy on complex chords. AudioShake's MIDI conversion is more accurate for polyphonic instruments, but it's a more advanced workflow.

Fadr wins for everyday users with its affordable price, easy browser-based workflow, and excellent vocal separation; AudioShake is a pro tool for studios that need top-tier fidelity and advanced features.

If you're a regular person who wants to remix songs, extract vocals, or master your own music without breaking the bank, start with Fadr — it's cheap, fast, and works in your browser. Only consider AudioShake if you're a professional who needs pristine audio quality for commercial releases and have the budget to match.

Visit AudioShake Visit Fadr

Detail pages: AudioShake · Fadr

AudioShake

Fadr

Free plan

Mobile app

API access