Decision Support · Side-by-side

Bigjpg vs Img.Upscale. Side by side.

Compare pricing, strengths, and use cases so it is easier to pick the right fit.

Browse alternatives Browse workflows

Change tools

Comparison Ready

Bigjpg

Img.Upscale

Best overall

For most everyday users, Img.Upscale wins on speed and ease, especially if you need quick, high-quality upscaling of photos or mixed images. Bigjpg is the better choice if you work primarily with anime or digital illustrations and want affordable batch processing, but its free tier is painfully slow. The single biggest difference is speed: Img.Upscale processes images in seconds, while Bigjpg can take minutes on free servers.

Bigjpg

Free tier available, paid plans from $6 USD #661 of 3,826 Web

Img.Upscale

Free Tier Available and Paid Plans from $19/year #934 of 3,826 Web

Scores at a glance

BigjpgImg.UpscalePractical Versatility

Onboarding Ease

Ecosystem Fit

Market Value

Choose Bigjpg if

You're an anime fan or digital artist who regularly upscales illustrations or fan art
You need to batch upscale dozens of images and want the cheapest long-term plan
You're restoring old, low-resolution game sprites or pixel art
You don't mind waiting a few minutes per image on the free tier

Choose Img.Upscale if

You need to quickly upscale photos of family, pets, or landscapes for printing or sharing
You're a casual user who only upscales a few images per month and wants zero hassle
You want to try before you buy — the free tier is fast enough to test quality
You prefer a modern, clean interface and don't want to deal with a clunky website

Key differences

Bigjpg is slower but cheaper for heavy batch work; Img.Upscale is fast but limits free usage
Bigjpg excels at anime/illustrations; Img.Upscale has separate models for portraits, anime, and landscapes
Bigjpg offers a desktop client for stable batch processing; Img.Upscale is web-only
Img.Upscale has a one-day pass option; Bigjpg only has monthly/yearly subscriptions
Bigjpg's free tier supports up to 10MB images; Img.Upscale's free tier is more restrictive on image count
Img.Upscale's interface is modern and beginner-friendly; Bigjpg's website feels dated

Facts side by side

	Bigjpg	Img.Upscale
Free plan
Mobile app
API access

Bigjpg: strengths & weaknesses

Excellent at upscaling anime and digital art without blurring lines
Very cheap long-term plans ($6/month) for batch work
Works on web and has a desktop client for stable batch processing
Strong noise reduction that cleans up grainy illustrations
Free processing is very slow — expect to wait minutes per image
Website looks outdated and can feel clunky to navigate
Doesn't handle realistic human skin well (can look waxy)
No mobile app, so you can't use it on your phone

Img.Upscale: strengths & weaknesses

Blazing fast — most images process in 5-10 seconds
Clean, ad-free interface that's easy to use even for beginners
Specialized AI models for portraits, anime, and landscapes give better results per image type
Offers a one-day pass for $19/year, so you don't have to commit to a subscription
Free tier is very limited (likely only a few images per day)
No offline or desktop version for Linux users
Requires a stable internet connection — no offline use

Common questions

Is Bigjpg better than Img.Upscale for upscaling anime art?

Yes, Bigjpg is specifically optimized for anime and illustrations, producing sharper lines and fewer artifacts. Img.Upscale also has an anime model, but Bigjpg handles noise reduction better for that style.

Can I use these tools on my phone?

Neither tool has a dedicated mobile app. Both work through a mobile web browser, but the experience is clunky. For phone use, consider a mobile-first alternative like Remini or Pixelcut.

Which tool is faster for a single image?

Img.Upscale is much faster — typically 5-10 seconds per image. Bigjpg can take 30 seconds to several minutes on the free tier, even for small images.

Do I need to pay to get good quality?

Both free tiers produce decent quality, but Img.Upscale's free tier is faster and easier to test. Bigjpg's free tier is usable but slow. For consistent results, Img.Upscale's $19/year plan is a better value for most people.

Which tool is better for upscaling old family photos?

Img.Upscale is better because it has a dedicated 'Portrait' model that handles realistic skin tones and faces. Bigjpg struggles with human skin and can make it look waxy.

Can I upscale multiple images at once?

Yes, both support batch processing. Bigjpg's desktop client is more stable for large batches. Img.Upscale's web interface handles batches well but may have stricter limits on the free tier.

Img.Upscale wins for speed and ease of use; Bigjpg wins for cheap anime/illustration batch work.

If you're a regular person who just wants to make your photos or images bigger without a headache, start with Img.Upscale — it's fast, easy, and the $19/year plan is a steal. Only pick Bigjpg if you live and breathe anime or digital art and need the cheapest batch option, even if it means waiting longer.

Visit Bigjpg Visit Img.Upscale

Detail pages: Bigjpg · Img.Upscale

Bigjpg

Img.Upscale

Free plan

Mobile app

API access