Decision Support · Side-by-side
Compare pricing, strengths, and use cases so it is easier to pick the right fit.
Change tools
Shadow 2.0
Best overallFor most people, Shadow 2.0 wins if you're on a Mac and value privacy and zero meeting disruption, while Briefly wins if you need deep CRM integrations and work across multiple platforms. The single biggest difference: Shadow runs invisibly on your Mac with no bot, but Briefly works on any OS and connects directly to HubSpot or Salesforce.
Briefly
Shadow 2.0
Scores at a glance
Choose Briefly if
Choose Shadow 2.0 if
Key differences
Facts side by side
| Briefly | Shadow 2.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | ||
| Mobile app | ||
| API access |
Common questions
Yes, if you use a CRM like HubSpot or Salesforce. Briefly automatically updates records and creates follow-up emails. Shadow 2.0 doesn't connect directly to CRMs.
No. Shadow 2.0 is exclusively for macOS. If you're on Windows, choose Briefly.
Shadow 2.0. All audio stays on your Mac unless you choose to upload it. Briefly processes audio in the cloud, which is less private.
No. Shadow runs silently on your Mac and detects meetings automatically. No one in the meeting will know it's recording.
Shadow 2.0. You install it, grant permissions, and it works. Briefly requires 10 onboarding steps including CRM mapping and keyword setup.
Neither has a mobile app. Both require a laptop or desktop computer.
Shadow 2.0 wins for Mac users who want invisible, private meeting capture; Briefly wins for teams needing CRM automation and cross-platform support.
If you're on a Mac and want a set-it-and-forget-it tool that respects privacy, go with Shadow 2.0. If you need deep CRM integration or work on Windows, Briefly is your pick. Both have free tiers, so try each for a few meetings before committing.
Detail pages: Briefly · Shadow 2.0
