Decision Support · Side-by-side

Klu vs Shadow 2.0. Side by side.

Compare pricing, strengths, and use cases so it is easier to pick the right fit.

Browse alternatives Browse workflows

Change tools

Comparison Ready

Klu

Shadow 2.0

Best overall

For most everyday users, Shadow 2.0 wins on privacy and ease of use if you own a Mac, but Klu is the better choice if you need to work across Windows or want deep integrations with tools like Notion and Slack. The single biggest difference is platform: Shadow is macOS-only and bot-free, while Klu works on any system but requires a visible bot in meetings.

Klu

#3940 of 3,826 Web

Shadow 2.0

Free tier available Web

Scores at a glance

KluShadow 2.0Practical Versatility

Onboarding Ease

Ecosystem Fit

Market Value

Choose Klu if

You use Windows or Linux and need meeting transcription
You rely on Notion, Asana, or Slack to manage tasks and want notes turned into action items automatically
You're on a team that already uses a CRM and wants meeting summaries pushed there
You don't mind a bot appearing in your meetings as a participant

Choose Shadow 2.0 if

You own a Mac and want a meeting assistant that records silently without a bot
You handle sensitive information (legal, medical, sales negotiations) and need local-only processing
You record customer demos or presentations and need screen capture with timestamps
You want to try before you buy — the free tier covers up to 10 meetings with no commitment

Key differences

Shadow 2.0 is macOS-only; Klu works on any OS via browser or desktop app
Shadow records locally for privacy; Klu sends audio to the cloud for processing
Klu has a visible bot in meetings; Shadow is invisible to participants
Klu integrates directly with Notion, Asana, Slack, and CRMs; Shadow only connects via Zapier
Shadow offers a free tier (10 meetings/month); Klu's pricing is not publicly listed
Shadow captures screen activity; Klu focuses on audio transcription and task extraction

Facts side by side

	Klu	Shadow 2.0
Free plan
Mobile app
API access

Klu: strengths & weaknesses

Works on any computer (Mac, Windows, browser) so you're not locked to one OS
Automatically creates tasks in Asana, Notion, or Slack after meetings
Connects to your calendar and joins meetings without you clicking record
Pricing is hidden — you have to contact sales, which is a red flag for budget-conscious users
No mobile app, so you can't review notes on the go
Transcription can struggle with background noise or heavy accents
Requires a bot to join the meeting, which some colleagues find intrusive

Shadow 2.0: strengths & weaknesses

No bot in the meeting — it runs silently on your Mac, so nobody knows it's recording
Records both audio and screen with timestamps, perfect for reviewing demos or presentations
Free tier lets you try 10 meetings/month with no credit card
All processing stays on your Mac by default, so sensitive conversations never leave your computer
Mac only — no Windows, no Linux, no phone app
Free tier caps at 10 meetings, which may not be enough for heavy users
Limited native integrations — you need Zapier to connect to most tools
Speaker identification can mix up people in noisy rooms

Common questions

Is Klu better than Shadow 2.0 for privacy?

No. Shadow 2.0 is much better for privacy because it processes and stores everything on your Mac by default. Klu sends your meeting audio to its servers, which may be a concern for confidential conversations.

Can I use Shadow 2.0 on my phone?

No. Shadow 2.0 is only available for macOS desktop. There is no mobile app or web version. Klu also has no mobile app, so neither tool lets you record or review meetings on your phone.

Which tool is easier to set up for a non-technical person?

Shadow 2.0 is easier. You just install it on your Mac, grant permissions, and it automatically detects and joins meetings. Klu requires connecting your calendar, installing a browser extension, and configuring integrations, which takes more steps.

Which tool is better for a team using Slack and Notion?

Klu is better for teams using Slack and Notion because it has native integrations that automatically push summaries and tasks into those tools. Shadow 2.0 requires Zapier to connect, which adds complexity.

Is Klu worth the price if it's not published?

Probably not for individuals or small teams. Hidden pricing often means it's enterprise-focused and expensive. Shadow 2.0's free tier and transparent pricing make it a safer bet for everyday users.

Can either tool transcribe meetings in languages other than English?

Yes. Shadow 2.0 supports real-time transcription in approximately 100 languages. Klu also supports multiple languages, but its accuracy can drop in noisy environments regardless of language.

Shadow 2.0 wins for Mac users who want privacy and ease; Klu wins for cross-platform teams that live in Notion and Slack.

If you're on a Mac and care about privacy, start with Shadow 2.0's free tier — it's simple, invisible, and keeps your data local. If you use Windows or need notes to flow directly into your team's tools, Klu is the better fit, but be prepared to negotiate pricing. Either way, both tools will save you time on meeting notes.

Visit Klu Visit Shadow 2.0

Detail pages: Klu · Shadow 2.0

Klu

Shadow 2.0

Free plan

Mobile app

API access