Decision Support · Side-by-side
Compare pricing, strengths, and use cases so it is easier to pick the right fit.
Change tools
Runway Gen-4
Best overallFor everyday users, Runway Gen-4 is the clear winner: it's accessible, has a free tier, and produces high-quality videos quickly. Make-A-Video is a research project, not a usable product—it lacks a public app, pricing, and mobile support. The single biggest difference is that Runway Gen-4 is ready to use today, while Make-A-Video is essentially a demo you can't run yourself.
Make-A-Video
Runway Gen-4
Scores at a glance
Choose Make-A-Video if
Choose Runway Gen-4 if
Key differences
Facts side by side
| Make-A-Video | Runway Gen-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | ||
| Mobile app | ||
| API access |
Common questions
No. Make-A-Video has no mobile app and no mobile-friendly interface. It's a research project that requires a computer with coding skills to run.
Yes. You can sign up on the website, use the free tier, and generate a video from a text prompt in minutes. No technical skills needed.
Runway Gen-4 is the only practical choice. Make-A-Video is not available to the public, so you cannot use it for social media.
Yes, it has a free tier with limited credits. You can try it before deciding to pay. Paid plans start at $12 per month.
In theory, Make-A-Video has strong temporal consistency, but you can't actually use it. Runway Gen-4 produces excellent quality that is good enough for most creators and is actively improving.
Runway Gen-4's paid plans allow commercial use. Make-A-Video's terms are unclear, and it has no commercial API access.
Runway Gen-4 is the only practical choice for everyday users; Make-A-Video is a research demo you can't run.
If you're a regular person who wants to make AI videos today, go with Runway Gen-4. It's easy, works in your browser, and has a free trial. Make-A-Video is interesting research, but it's not something you can actually use unless you're a developer with a Meta account.
Detail pages: Make-A-Video · Runway Gen-4